Thread Rating:
The George (proposed)
|
11-19-2013, 04:53 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The George (proposed)
This proposal looks to me unfortunately similar to the Watermark in Sechelt, the same 'I wish to look down on you nobody' height and mass, two twin towers tight together, the same disdain for pedestrians and anyone else who might otherwise enjoy a water view. Perhaps too the same market result and disappointment to the community; sellers lose, project is mostly empty most of the time.
Economic impact on Gibsons, nhil, and opportunity lost, once a bit of a construction boom is done. But there is the 'notwithstanding clause' which does not allow the proponent to go ahead anyhow, it says Council may consider, and having considered may say 'absolutely not, not in our town'. Gibsons has for years had better mayors and councils than Sechelt, so I am optomistic that they will toss George on its head. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The George (proposed) - by Jezebella - 11-14-2013, 03:28 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 11-15-2013, 06:12 AM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Jezebella - 11-17-2013, 02:20 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 11-17-2013, 02:46 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Jezebella - 11-17-2013, 03:08 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by HenryH - 11-19-2013, 04:53 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 11-20-2013, 05:40 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Jezebella - 12-05-2013, 11:12 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 12-06-2013, 05:55 AM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 12-06-2013, 01:26 PM
RE: The George (proposed) - by Skook - 12-07-2013, 06:26 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)